Shona Ghosh


Webby 2009: predictions and speeches

Webby Award winners will be announced tomorrow, with hundreds of techies nominees jostling to win accolades across the categories of ‘website’, ‘interative advertising’, ‘mobile’ and ‘online film & video’. Obviously website is the biggie, and site categories range from ‘activism’ to ‘youth’. Two awards are available in each site category; the panel’s choice and the people’s choice.

Mostly no one really cares about the Webbies, but they’re an excellent way of discovering new sites. Look out for the ones favoured by the great unwashed people’s choice rather than the judge panel. I only discovered PostSecret after last year’s awards, and Sad Guys on Trading Floors is an excellent piss-take this year. Take a look at the rest of the Weird section by way of example.

British websites are doing reasonably well with 58 nominations, with the Beeb vying for eight and the Guardian for six. A few of my own media-related predictions. I’ll be posting on the winners tomorrow:

Best newspaper: New York Times. Tough call, but it’s consistently one step ahead of the Guardian when it comes to innovating news content.

Best news: The Huffington Post. Daily Beast has been gaining momentum, but isn’t quite there yet.

Podcast: The Guardian. Maybe because of my own particular attachment to the nice producers there who let me mess about in the control room on work experience.

Perhaps to compensate for the fact that really, it should be a cloud-based ceremony, techie histrionics are limited to a 5 word acceptance speech. Corkers include ‘Can someone fix my computer?’ from 2007′s top artist Beastie Boys and ‘Shit, I only get five words? Shit, that was five. Four more there. That’s three. Two’ from David Bowie accepting a lifetime achievement award.

Here’s a pick of the best from last year:

Top 5 5-worders, 2008

“Thank you for this Pulitzer.”  Onion News Network, News & Politics: Series

“We enjoy sleeping with you.”  Ikea Mattress, Retail

“Get your money for nothing.”  Mint.com, Banking

“And your mint for free.”  Mint.com, Financial Services

“Thanks, in 72 point Helvetica.” Veer, Best Use of Typography

You can view the rest here, and you can submit your own #5words speech to @thewebbyawards.



T-Mobile dance…part deux
April 29, 2009, 3:57 pm
Filed under: Internet, News | Tags: , , , ,

Breaking news for you right here. T-Mobile will be filming another flash mob stunt (rumoured to be another dance) between 6-7pm tomorrow at Trafalgar Square, no doubt in the hope it will go viral. Can’t get any more specific than that because my dad deleted the text from T-Mobile before I got a good look at it. Yes, I will go and film it for you. Sheesh. The things I do.

UPDATE: Actually, after wading through the magnificent beaurospeak of the bye-laws I discover I can’t film without permission from Boris. Should’ve just asked when I met him really. I also spotted this little gem, to give you an idea of how much T-Mobile might be paying to pull this little stunt:

Anyone using Trafalgar Square must obtain Public Liability Insurance with a minimum of £5 million cover for each act or occurrence or series of acts or occurrences. A higher level of insurance cover may be required depending on the event content.

Ouch! Still, you can enjoy the first flash mob dance at Liverpool Street Station:

Video by T-Mobile.



£2bn for some tasty data traffic

Decent, upstanding British citizens will no doubt be spending today reading Jacqui Smith’s latest opus on data privacy. Yes, all 49 pages of it, so that you can answer some questions (which are, incidentally, in ‘Annex A’ so get reading) . This is, after all, for your sole benefit and the government ‘would welcome your views’.

Oh alright. I’ll summarise it here.

Since May last year, the government has been bleating about a central database in which to store information about how we communicate. Primarily it’s a counter-terrorism measure but it’s um, also quite a big privacy infringement. So under the Interception Modernisation Programme (which really, when you think about it, literally means ‘better ways of snooping’) the government is proposing ways to effectively ‘save lives’ while not spying.

The database isn’t going to happen any more, it says. Which is peculiar, because it then goes on to outline exactly how it would go about creating a data store, if it was allowed to. Which it isn’t.

Nothing’s law yet. Hence this consultation report where you – because that will be your data eventually – get to raise objections.

It’s an educational document. By the second page I am graced with such insights as: Communications data is information about a communication. And Jacqui Smith’s inappropriately beaming face on the introduction which, for your own safety, I have replaced with serious cat.

This is the bit where she says the database isn’t happening. But, in case you were interested, she tells you how it would work anyway on p25.

The next bit’s quite important though. And for all the paranoia, it’s not as though anyone will actually read your racist jokes/cybersex/ascii art.

Communications data does not include the content of a call or the content of any other communications event, such as an email. This consultation does not propose changing the law to collect or store the content of any communication.

No, but it will try and get everything but. Mostly by coercing service providers into doing it for them.

As it stands, VoIP services like Skype currently don’t hold that much information about you. Or at least, not enough to be of any use. Indeed, Skype isn’t actually a UK service provider, so it’d be down to ISP’s like BT, Virgin etc to actually collect the times and destinations of your Skype calls. They’d also have to arrange it nicely so that the authorities aren’t flailing around uselessly with numbers. This, aside from the database or doing nothing, is the ‘middle way’. And here, quietly tucked away, is the £2bn cost estimate to compensate the private sector.

What next?

UK service providers will take a look over these suggestions and respond. This isn’t good news for them; they’ll be bearing the brunt of the costs for a lot of extra work, and potentially compromising the privacy of their customers. Equally, the intelligence agencies are disappointed by this seemingly flimsy resolution. Not having a central database makes piecing together data about one individual more difficult. In short, no one has won.

srsly watchin you



Geocities goes down the Yahoo pipe
April 24, 2009, 7:35 pm
Filed under: Internet, Technology | Tags: , , ,

Reports are filtering through the web that the latest Yahoo amputee will be 90′s DIY webkit GeoCities. Similar tools Angelfire and Tripod are reputed to be in trouble according to a comic eulogy from PC World. The Guardian feels a certain ‘pixel nostalgia’ for the swathes of dreadful content relegated to the digital abyss.

Most people have forgotten about GeoCities, because it failed to innovate. Its interface didn’t get any cleaner or easier to use. No one has an ‘about me’ page just for the hell of it any more – you know, the kind of thing with a picture of your dog and an awful Word 97 fun ‘border’. Users have become a lot savvier about building their own websites, especially since friendly CMS’s like WordPress popped up.

Being a 2.0 nerd I naturally created my own GeoCities monstrosity back in the day. Isn’t it beautiful? Mismatching colour schemes, in-built ad bar and what one visitor described as a ‘flaming turd’ across the masthead. I hasten to add that I was about 16. At least it wasn’t chatrooms, alright?

All of that was created with the wonderful PageBuilder which is so backward I couldn’t even get it to open in Firefox. From memory though, it was a web building tool which took an age to load across several Explorer windows and then crashed. A lot.

The ‘main page’ buttons on my site used to flash – an effect created by making two separate picture files interchange very quickly when your mouse hovered over them. Sadly that sophisticated little feature seems not to work on most modern browsers…and soon, neither will GeoCities.

blog-geocities

Apologies to anyone who read an accidental first draft of this. Got a bit keen pushing the new post on Twitter. So keen, I hadn’t even completed it.



Twitterbitching, Twitterfail

Ah, sweet proof that even the best of us are prone to the occasional FAIL, troll and snarkfest. First up in the Twitterbitching ring -

Charles Arthur v …the entire Telegraph web team

The Guardian was rubbing its liberal hands with glee after the Telegraph’s Budget homepage was spammed by Twitter-users merrily taking advantage of the #budget tag to appear on the site’s Twitterfall feed. The Guardian then went on to list its favourite spammers before the feed was eventually taken down….

….and then put back up. Rumour has it that the Telegraph now has monkeys (in fact, quite possibly my City colleagues who are currently working there) frantically filtering the tweets before they’re actually allowed onto the live feed – unsubstantiated as yet. Certainly the feed appears to have slowed down, which has not gone unnoticed by Guardian Tech editor Charles Arthur, who tweeted:

50 tweets with #budget for the past hour. I could do this faster than the Telegraph. I could *automate* this better than them. Guys, give up

You can read the response from Telegraph assistant web editor Justin Williams below. Miaow! The sniping played itself out over Twitter until BBC tech heavyweights Darren Waters and Bill Thompson eventually weighed in on Charles’ side. Rather sweetly, Telegraph communities editor Shane Richmond tweets, “It’s a snapshot of the conversation that’s going on around the Budget. Why is that so hard to figure out?” Because it’s “undirected and pointless” says Charles.

There is an interesting underlying debate here – Shane, Justin and co. seem to be entirely in favour of unfiltered conversation. Except when they have monkeys filtering it (hm). Charles and the Guardian crew lean towards using social media for journalistic purposes, but favouring ‘authoratative’ voices. Have a look at their G20 Twitterfall-style feed (actually using Scribblelive) by way of example. Rather than allowing all and sundry through with a #G20 tag, the Guardian only showed tweets from its own journalists and bloggers. Elitism, or a sensible way to avoid spam?

The Twitter fight, read from the bottom up.

twitterbudgetpsop1

UPDATE: A quick glance back at the Budget homepage shows the Twitterfall feed has been pulled off again. You can see a screenshot on the Guardian’s article, however. Ding ding ding!



Snooping dragon – China’s political hackers
March 29, 2009, 11:21 pm
Filed under: Internet, Technology | Tags: , , , , , ,

A friend of mine has just begun to blog about teaching sixth-formers English in an eastern province of China. Commenting on setting up his WordPress, he says:

I found my initial attempts at communication barricaded by the Great Firewall of China (no, not an example of my parched dry wit; Party officials really do refer to it as such) and so I’ve had to look into other options. If you’re currently scanning this page, it’s finally worked…

The sheer manpower needed for Chinese paranoia to run at all levels continues to astonish, since it includes not merely the harmless gap year blog but its highest political enemies.

So says the ‘snooping dragon’ report, a joint effort from Cambridge University and the University of Illinois. Look beyond the academic propensity for headline puns and it makes a terrifying read.  Authors Ross Anderson and Shishir Nagaraja describe how the Dalai Lama’s offices first became aware of information leaks with potentially dire consequences for Tibetans. His administration set up one meeting with a foreign diplomat via e-mail. Before they had even made the follow-up courtesy phone call, Chinese government officials contacted the diplomat to instruct him that the meeting could not go ahead. How was this possible without a security breach?

Further investigation showed that Chinese IP addresses – not associated with the Dalai Lama’s offices -  had logged into their servers.

Obviously the monks hadn’t been watching Swordfish, although frankly even they managed to be more up-to-date than Jack Straw. Hacking into their email accounts was, it seems, relatively easy since they were defended by low-security passwords and plain-text mail.  Unfortunately, even encryption wasn’t going to work as the monks had fallen for the virus-as-a-link gag, otherwise known as phishing.

Easy enough to avoid, but more nastily, the hackers managed to interrupt legit mail in transit and replace harmless attachments with malicious ones. So while Gyaltsen Norbu might have been showing off his new robes to Tenzin Gyatso in a picture attachment, it probably arrived as something unmentionable.

Luckily for the Tibetans, no deeply secret documents were exploited and their safety has not been compromised. But the authors finish on an ominous note – that these personalised phishing and hacking techniques are easily replicable:

In the medium term we predict that social malware will be used for fraud, and the typical company has really no defence against it. We expect that many crooks will get rich before
e ffective countermeasures are widely deployed.

Jack Schofield writes that Western companies should learn to safeguard against this, and fast. What is perhaps more sad is those who continue to believe in the ideals of the internet – the sharing and movement of information – may find themselves increasingly cynical of how this freedom will be exploited. Once you’ve scaled the Great Firewall, a dragon lies in wait.



The science of online dating
December 30, 2008, 11:01 pm
Filed under: Internet | Tags: , , , , ,

Who’s your type? Tall? Dark? Wields a club? Now that we’ve gone mad over virtual realities, it seems that more people are looking to find romance online. Whether it’s a WoW marriage or a Second Life divorce, the freaks are finally finding their geeks.

But there’s always some sniggering behind palms, a frisson of taboo about online dating. It’s never entirely OK in polite company to admit you fell for your better half because he makes you roflcopter.

Perhaps romance is the one thing that will never go fully digital. In our increasingly hysterical attempts to live almost every aspect of our lives out online (Twitter Elite, I’m looking at you), nature is desperately anchoring us back to reality.

And funnily enough, there might be some tabloid solid science behind that.

Maybe it’s something to with pheromones, smell before you buy kind of thing. There is Reasonable Evidence To Suggest ™ that smell dictates your choice of partner – your nose helps you find someone with dissimilar genes to yourself. Some companies are going as far as to offer genetic compatability tests for couples – which Lisa Geddes hilariously tests in this week’s New Scientist.

And it’s a little hard to sniff out someone’s major histocompatibility complex genes over a screen. So smell is out.

The closest you get is maybe a thumbnail. Usually taken in ‘flattering’ light. Or of a 7ft fighter class troll, depending on where you like to hang out online. But surely no one can be that good at Photoshop. The usual trick for ugly people is to cast photos in black and white. No really – go and look on Facebook.

Let’s try a small experiment. Which picture of me do you find more attractive? (‘Pass’ is not an option).

According to some – possibly dubious – research earlier this year, the answer is left. It’s not simply that the photo is in colour, but that it particularly has a red background. Anything else is actually quite ineffectual, so the uggers are, sadly, still uggers in black and white. Ideally, you should be wearing red, but a red background is almost as good. Any other colour does little or nothing to increase attraction – and that works for both sexes. To the point where it even encourages men to pay for dinner – a theory I shall be testing on an unsuspecting victim later this week. (Results may well be blogged). If your digital dish has been employing this tactic, you know you’ve been duped.

So stick to the old-fashioned way, and don’t respond to that poke on Facebook. It could be the start of something unnatural…



Oh noes, Minister
December 29, 2008, 1:04 am
Filed under: Internet, Technology | Tags: , ,

Regulation. As events which have been coming for ages you stupid bastards recently have indicated, there isn’t enough of it. And if a ‘light touch’ approach to financial regulation got us into this mess, who knows what other rogue areas might lurk out there.

Enter Andy Burnham in red Superman pants, crying ‘Protect the children!’. For super is presumably what he is. Because he has declared his vision of a new future where:

1) All English-language websites will have age ratings, like films.
2) ISPs can be made to police the internet, to ensure this happens.
3) This is definitely an achievable task
4) If the ISPs prove it’s not possible (by failing), the government will make new legislation anyway
5) Obama’s new administration will absolutely, definitely care about this and not view Mr Burnham as a plonker. At all.

According to Mr Burnham, the internet is a ‘dangerous world’ in need of censorship – namely by sticking age-ratings tags on websites. The sheer unworkability of the idea means that Mr Burnham has evidently not discussed this with industry experts, policy makers or, I suspect, his own children. Chris Applegate excellently takes apart the multitude of ways in which this won’t work, including tackling breathtaking amounts of content:

It certainly won’t look like a BBFC [British Board of Film Classification] for the web: First there’s questions of scale: the total number of sites (not counting subdomains) alone is around 156 million

There is also the small issue of the Internet as global property. British regulations would apply to UK websites while international sites would happily show Mr Burnham the digital finger. He is not so ignorant though, to think that the web comes under UK legislation alone:

He is planning to negotiate with Barack Obama’s incoming American administration to draw up new international rules for English language websites.

Guardian readers can no doubt await a Steve Bell vision of a small child tugging on the coat sleeve of its parent.

There is relatively little to suggest the proposed measures can be anything other than political bluff. Once again, the government is attempting to shovel responsibility anywhere other than on parents. Far more cost-effective to encourage web-literacy and monitoring in parents. There is no reason why this can’t simply be a job done at home, but as BBC tech writer Bill Thompson tweets disgustedly:

Burnham wants to be seen to be doing something, and will end up blaming ‘the industry’ for not being supportive.. that’s how it goes.

Mr Burnham did not, incidentally, indicate who would fund his proposed measures.



India tops gay googling
December 27, 2008, 8:13 pm
Filed under: Internet | Tags: , , , ,

When cultural satire Goodness Gracious Me was in its heyday, it popularised stereotypes lurking unexposed behind respectable, slightly curry-stained net curtains. All across Leicester the country, British Indian families delighted in the parody, not least the problem of the gay son.




My cousin in Calcutta is also a ‘good boy’. At 9 years old, he refused to share his brother’s toy lorries and cars, tending instead to his own Barbie doll. At 19, he has never bought any girlfriends home. But the word ‘gay’ has never been mentioned by my family. Not once. If my cousin chose to declare the ‘wrong’ choice of sexuality, it would never be acknowledged. As with….well, pretty much everything, India remains torn between modern attitudes and centuries of intolerant barbarity. Under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, practising homosexuals can still receive life sentences.
(more…)



Punish downloaders, say UK film directors
December 17, 2008, 11:04 pm
Filed under: Internet, News | Tags: , , , , , , ,

British film and TV producers, writers and directors have written to the Times to voice concerns that the creative industry is dying at the hands of illegal film downloaders.

The list includes prominent figures such as Kenneth Branagh, Sir Alan Parker, Ken Loach and Terry Jones among many others.

Their concerns are real enough. The added financial pressure of losing valuable advertising has driven state-owned broadcaster Channel 4 to the brink. Currently the UK Government is considering privatisation, a merge with BBC World Service or further public funding for the service.
(more…)




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.