<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Shona Ghosh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shonaghosh.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shonaghosh.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hands up if you hate Instagram by shonaghosh</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/08/29/hands-up-if-you-hate-instagram/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shonaghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1115#comment-533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I realise from its growing user numbers and general popularity that I am fighting a losing battle with Instagram ;)

As your (lovely) story indicates, these things are so personal. No one ever takes a photo thinking, &#039;Hey, am I falling in line with the per-conceived notion of what a good photo should be?&#039;. 

I think my main annoyance - and is this is a personal thing too - stems from seeing a lot of &#039;hipster&#039;, trendy friends taking arty shots of their weekend activities and posting them on Facebook as a kind of glossy magazine version of their lives. I know that&#039;s the human tendency and we all fall prey to it - but it still irritates me at a personal level. When I see that same glossy magazine, rose-tinted-glasses technique used on something like, say, war photography, it seems a strange way to present reality. 

But I can see the vast majority of users on Instagram et al are just using the service for their own, personal enjoyment which of course they&#039;re allowed to do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realise from its growing user numbers and general popularity that I am fighting a losing battle with Instagram <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As your (lovely) story indicates, these things are so personal. No one ever takes a photo thinking, &#8216;Hey, am I falling in line with the per-conceived notion of what a good photo should be?&#8217;. </p>
<p>I think my main annoyance &#8211; and is this is a personal thing too &#8211; stems from seeing a lot of &#8216;hipster&#8217;, trendy friends taking arty shots of their weekend activities and posting them on Facebook as a kind of glossy magazine version of their lives. I know that&#8217;s the human tendency and we all fall prey to it &#8211; but it still irritates me at a personal level. When I see that same glossy magazine, rose-tinted-glasses technique used on something like, say, war photography, it seems a strange way to present reality. </p>
<p>But I can see the vast majority of users on Instagram et al are just using the service for their own, personal enjoyment which of course they&#8217;re allowed to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hands up if you hate Instagram by anohershonaghosh dad</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/08/29/hands-up-if-you-hate-instagram/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anohershonaghosh dad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1115#comment-518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago I used to call myself a hardcore gamer. Now, with a family and a busy career, I have resigned to the fact that I will now be a &#039;mainstream&#039; gamer. From being the first one to try out a mad, I now follow gaming mags, blogs and speedruns/video walkthroughs. The spectator mode is my new form of online gaming.  Why do I make this comment here? Because that represents the fate of many consumers, who wish they could produce excellent photos, but can&#039;t. There are many reasons for that : Lack of time, lack of resources, an inability to use software, let alone high end photo editing programmes. Does that mean we should stop wanting to create &#039;beautiful&#039; photos??  

I have a flickr pro account, and own a few cameras including a canon 5d mark ii. But when my child was born following an emergency procedure, and again at 3 am when I was feeding the infant and noticed an interesting shot, I only had my smart phone with me. In the ITU, should I not have used a filter to take a slightly blurred dream like photo which to me resembled my hopes for this child, even when we were counting hours and days?  Or should I have shot the photo in &#039;normal mode&#039; and then come home and edited it while I was hardly getting 4 hours of sleep running to and from the hospital? 

I think you make a point of not allowing twitter [in some other blog post] and instagram take over the role of mainstream / hardcore professionalism. But at the same time, do think about why these quick fixes mean so much to people. At one time photo shop was frowned upon for exactly the same reasons people do not like instagram. However, unless there were consumers for any form of art/ creativity / productivity tools, people would not be investing money into researching better cameras or for that matter almost any form of technological advancement. It would not be helpful to not respect this aspect . 

I do however respect your opinions as being your own. I am sure people will share your views. I felt compelled to write only because I feel that in recent years I have crossed over to the other side :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I used to call myself a hardcore gamer. Now, with a family and a busy career, I have resigned to the fact that I will now be a &#8216;mainstream&#8217; gamer. From being the first one to try out a mad, I now follow gaming mags, blogs and speedruns/video walkthroughs. The spectator mode is my new form of online gaming.  Why do I make this comment here? Because that represents the fate of many consumers, who wish they could produce excellent photos, but can&#8217;t. There are many reasons for that : Lack of time, lack of resources, an inability to use software, let alone high end photo editing programmes. Does that mean we should stop wanting to create &#8216;beautiful&#8217; photos??  </p>
<p>I have a flickr pro account, and own a few cameras including a canon 5d mark ii. But when my child was born following an emergency procedure, and again at 3 am when I was feeding the infant and noticed an interesting shot, I only had my smart phone with me. In the ITU, should I not have used a filter to take a slightly blurred dream like photo which to me resembled my hopes for this child, even when we were counting hours and days?  Or should I have shot the photo in &#8216;normal mode&#8217; and then come home and edited it while I was hardly getting 4 hours of sleep running to and from the hospital? </p>
<p>I think you make a point of not allowing twitter [in some other blog post] and instagram take over the role of mainstream / hardcore professionalism. But at the same time, do think about why these quick fixes mean so much to people. At one time photo shop was frowned upon for exactly the same reasons people do not like instagram. However, unless there were consumers for any form of art/ creativity / productivity tools, people would not be investing money into researching better cameras or for that matter almost any form of technological advancement. It would not be helpful to not respect this aspect . </p>
<p>I do however respect your opinions as being your own. I am sure people will share your views. I felt compelled to write only because I feel that in recent years I have crossed over to the other side <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hands up if you hate Instagram by Jonathan Machen</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/08/29/hands-up-if-you-hate-instagram/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Machen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1115#comment-494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might want to re-think your header image for your blog - it looks as if you&#039;ve applied some retro-filter to it :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to re-think your header image for your blog &#8211; it looks as if you&#8217;ve applied some retro-filter to it <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google+ Circles = too many boxes by shonaghosh</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/07/11/google-circles-too-many-boxes/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shonaghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1057#comment-454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:-) Twitter lists are ace, really useful way of filtering I find.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Twitter lists are ace, really useful way of filtering I find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google+ Circles = too many boxes by Justin Morris</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/07/11/google-circles-too-many-boxes/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Morris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1057#comment-453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You just made me go create some twitter lists after I&#039;d never used them before. gg ghosho.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just made me go create some twitter lists after I&#8217;d never used them before. gg ghosho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Turntable.fm &#8211; a decent step forward in making music social by Rights holders &#8211; 1, Turntable.fm &#8211; 0 &#171; Shona Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/06/29/turntable-fm-a-decent-step-forward-in-making-music-social/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rights holders &#8211; 1, Turntable.fm &#8211; 0 &#171; Shona Ghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=1045#comment-450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was lucky to be early enough to test social music service Turntable.fm before the inevitable happened, and the startup fell foul of the licensing constraints which has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was lucky to be early enough to test social music service Turntable.fm before the inevitable happened, and the startup fell foul of the licensing constraints which has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google launches without the labels. Spotify says it won&#8217;t. by Why do people think digital lockers are the future of music? &#171; Shona Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2011/05/10/google-launches-without-the-labels-spotify-says-it-wont/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why do people think digital lockers are the future of music? &#171; Shona Ghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=999#comment-413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] wrote earlier this week that Spotify is still determined to get the labels on board, despite this having delayed its [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote earlier this week that Spotify is still determined to get the labels on board, despite this having delayed its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guardian&#8217;s best bands of 2010 by You</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2010/11/03/guardians-best-bands-of-2010/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=921#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, that Beach House are an ace new band. Particularly liked their third album...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that Beach House are an ace new band. Particularly liked their third album&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Miliband&#8217;s banana republic by shonaghosh</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2009/01/22/milibands-banana-republic/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shonaghosh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=297#comment-231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Paul!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Miliband&#8217;s banana republic by Paul Weston</title>
		<link>http://shonaghosh.com/2009/01/22/milibands-banana-republic/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Weston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shonaghosh.com/?p=297#comment-227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr shonaghosh, not Jackson May.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr shonaghosh, not Jackson May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

